The Confusion of Love and Duty
In the context of couples counselling, a recurring dynamic is the confusion of love with responsibility. When partners merge their emotional and practical obligations, the relationship often suffers from enmeshment, replacing authentic connection with a structure driven by anxiety and control.
As a couple’s counsellor, I often see love confused with responsibility. Alfred Adler taught that healthy relationships depend on respecting each partner’s “tasks” - their own feelings, actions, and choices. When these blur, enmeshment occurs. Adler’s understanding reminds us that love thrives not in fusion, but in cooperation, two equals sharing life, not solving or fixing each other.
Alfred Adler and the Shared Work of Love: Boundaries, Tasks, and Healthy Connection
As a couple’s counsellor, I often find that many relationship problems are not born from a lack of love, but from confusion about responsibility, about where one person’s emotional work ends, and the others begins. Alfred Adler, one of the early pioneers of psychology and therapy, offers a useful framework for understanding and solving this problem.
Adler believed that mental health depends on how we engage with three core life tasks: work, friendship, and love. Each represents a domain of social responsibility, of how we contribute, connect, and care. In relationships, the task of love is not about merging into one another but about cooperating as equals in a shared life, while maintaining one’s own individuality.
From an Adlerian perspective, problems arise when partners confuse these boundaries. This is when care can turn into control, empathy into pitying, and support into intrusion. This blurring of personal “tasks” is what we often call enmeshment: when one partner takes over the emotional or practical responsibilities that naturally belongs to the other. While enmeshment can feel like closeness, it is often driven by anxiety, fear of rejection, and a need to control outcomes.
Consider a fictional couple, Emma and Daniel. Emma feels deeply anxious when Daniel seems withdrawn after work. Instead of giving him space to transition from work to home, she hovers — checking in repeatedly, offering advice, trying to “fix” his mood. Daniel, feeling suffocated, and retreats further. Both end up frustrated and disconnected from each other. From an Adlerian perspective, Emma has misread Daniel’s quietness as her problem to resolve. She has taken on his emotional task, his responsibility to manage his own feelings, while neglecting her own task of tolerating discomfort and trusting the relationship’s resilience. Daniel also avoids his own responsibility to communicate his needs clearly.
In therapy, helping Emma and Daniel distinguish ‘whose task is whose’ restores balance in the relationship. Emma learns that genuine care sometimes means stepping back, allowing Daniel to experience and regulate his own emotions and her as his partner supporting him by keeping herself regulated while waiting for him to reach out to her. When Emma does not take on the task of bringing him around, she does not interfere with his emotional regulation. Daniel, in turn, recognises that being distant is a way of avoiding emotional engagement, and that love requires cooperation, not withdrawal. When each partner reclaims their own task, intimacy becomes more authentic and less reactive.
Adler believed that each person must take responsibility for their own thoughts, feelings, and actions. In a healthy relationship, each partner respects the autonomy of the other, while at the same time cooperating in shared goals. One partner cannot “make” the other happy; they can only create conditions that support happiness. When partners in a relationship accept this distinction, love becomes freer, less defensive, and more grounded in mutual respect.
Adler’s vision of love was profoundly egalitarian for its time: he saw it as a partnership of equals working toward common goals. Healthy boundaries are not barriers; they are the structure that allows cooperation without coercion, intimacy without loss of self.
When couples begin to see their relationship as a shared project, rather than a battlefield of unmet needs or blurred identities, compassion and connection increases. Each partner can finally do the one thing that makes love enduring: take full responsibility for their own tasks and trust their partner to do the same.
-
Add a short summary or a list of helpful resources here.